Wholesale: Products & Services

Archived System CR SCR110702-01 Detail

It would be VERY useful to have another column in the output of the splitter query or splitter query by range which lists the active circuitID or telephone number (or any other identifier which would enable us to quickly track down what Qwest thinks the port is being used for) instead of just a invalid with a message of Specified device VDA.XXXXXXX.XX.XX-NNN not available.

The IMA tool for CFA validation/lookup does exactly what we’re asking for here (allows us to query based on The cable we have in a given central office and range of pairs, resulting in columns which list (among other Things) the CKTID/CLO for any pair being used. We’re just looking for the same output functionality seen In CFA queries for VDA (Pots’s Splitter) queries.

Expected Deliverables/Proposed Implementation Date (if applicable): Modify a future/next version of IMA to include a column for CKTID/CLO or equivalent in the output of the POTS Splitter Query functionality or enhance the existing last column to say Specified device VDA.XXXXXXX.XX.XX-NNN not available used by CKTID 29.XXXX.XXX.XXXX or equivalent.

Status History

Project Meetings

May 31, 2007 Email Received From Complete Telecommunications: Sure -- go ahead and mark it as withdrawn :-) Thanks John Uhley Complete Telecom/VailNet

- May 31, 2007 Email Sent to Complete Telecommunications: Good Afternoon, This email is in regard to a CMP CR that Complete Telecommunications submitted, to Qwest, in November 0f 2002. I have attached a copy of the CR. In the 5 years since this CR was submitted, there has been some changes. The CR was submitted for Line Sharing and for POTs. Effective on July 13, 2007, Line Sharing is available through a Commercial Agreement only and is no longer a product that can utilize the CMP Process. Also, based on investigation, POTs is not applicable due to the data query being part of Line Sharing, making POTs not valid for this request. Based on this information, will Complete agree to withdraw SCR110702-01? Thank you for your prompt reply. Peggy Esquibel-Reed Qwest Wholesale CMP

- April 18, 2007 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Mark Coyne-Qwest stated that this attachment contained the Initial Prioritization List for the IMA 22.0 Release. Mark asked if there were any questions on the list. There were none. Mark then mentioned that Packaging would occur in the June timeframe and be communicated in CMP.

March 15, 2006 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Jill Martain-Qwest stated that the list of IMA 20.0 Initial Prioritization List is located in Attachment M. There were no questions or comments.

February 15, 2006 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion for IMA 20.0 Prioritization CR Review: Jill Martain-Qwest stated that the list of IMA 20.0 candidates is located in Attachment M. She said instead of reviewing all candidates each CLEC will indicate what their top 2 candidates are. Jill said that we will also review the prioritization and ranking instructions following this exercise. Lynn Stecklein-Qwest said that we will ask each CLEC what there top 2 candidates are based on the attendance list. Below are the top two candidates per CLEC in attendance: AT&T-Sharon Van Meter #1 SCR031203-02 Resolve Disconnect of Account Number #2 SCR040403-03 Support of Expedite Reason Field on the LSR Covad (via email) #1 SCR102102-1X Dual Inventory of DSL Tie Cables in TIRKs and SWITHCH/FOMS #2 SCR103103-01 Support of Parsed and Structured CSR #2 Eschelon-Kim Isaacs #1 SCR 050305-01 Bulk PIC Change Process in IMA #2 SCR032202-1 IMA GUI-PostOrder/Status Updates/Posted to be Billed Integra Laurie Fredricksen stated that she would have to get back to Qwest on there top 2 candidates. McleodUSA (via email) #1 SCR031103-01 Changes to Edits or Process Regarding Complex Listings on an ACT of N Order for Resale #2 SCR040403-03 Support of Expedite Reason Field on the LSR SBC Bob Eggert said he is the ASR representative and that he will refrain from the IMA 20.0 prioritization process. Time Warner-Dianne Friend #1 SCR010705-01 Directory Listing Changes in Conjunction with LNP #2 SCR042704-01 FBDL PON Field VCI No representative from VCI was present. Verizon Business-Rosalin Davis #1 SCR040403-03 Support of Expedite Reason Field on the LSR #2 Rosalin stated that she would get back to Qwest on her second candidate. Information received via e-mail: #1 SCR042704-01 FBDL PON Field #2 SCR040403-03 Support of Expedite Reason on the LSR XO No representative from XO was present. Sprint-Jeff Sonnier #1 SCR010705-01 Directory Listing Changes in Conjunction with LNP #2 SCR031105-01 Change of Usage of CCNA for Sprint on LNP Orders TDS (via email) Julie Pickar stated that she would have to get back to Qwest on there top 2 candidates. E-mail received 2/15/06 on the TDS top 2 candidates #1 SCR032202-1 IMA GUI-PostOrder/Status Updates/Posted to be Billed #2 SCR 050305-01 Bulk PIC Change Process in IMA Cox-Tom Larson #1 SCR010705-01 Directory Listing Changes in Conjunction with LNP No second pick. Qwest-Jill Martain #1 SCR021904-02 Suppression of Jeopardy Status Updates #2 SCR102505-02 Edits for the LSR Delivery Address Activity (DACT) Field Comcast (via email) #1 SCR102505-02 Edits for the LSR Delivery Address Activity (DACT) Field #2 SCR110702-01 Request to Add Ability for CLECs to Get a List of Circuit IDs or Telephone #s Associated with Active POTS-Splitter

Jill Martain-Qwest stated that we will include everyone’s top 2 candidates in the meeting minutes. Lynn Stecklein-Qwest reviewed the prioritization instructions. She said that Qwest will distribute the Prioritization Form by 5 p.m. MT on February 20, 2006. She said that the completed Prioritization Form should be submitted to cmpcr@qwest.com no more that 3 business days following Qwest’s distribution of the prioritization form. Lynn said that the total point will be calculated by the Qwest CMP Manager and the results will be distributed to the CLECs within 2 business days following the submission of the ranking and no later than 5 p.m. on February 27, 2006. Sharon Van Meter-AT&T asked if Qwest could explain how the highest point value works and how, for example, number 21 would be the top choice. Lynn Stecklein-Qwest said that the highest point value (i.e. 21) should be assigned to the CR that Qwest and CLECs wish to be implemented first. She said that the next highest point value (i.e. 20) should be assigned to the CR that Qwest and the CLECs wish to be implemented second and so on. Bonnie Johnson-Eschelon explained that we go through this exercise to take into consideration what the other CLECs top priorities are so that as each CLEC votes they could take into consideration the other CLECs top 2 as well instead of just ranking their top 2 and then going down the list. Jeff Sonnier-Sprint asked if the ballot would have a ‘Point Value’ Column. Jill Martain-Qwest said that the ballot would have the ‘Point Value’ Column and that instructions would be included with the notification. Bonnie Johnson-Eschelon asked what the IMA 20.0 capacity was, hinting at 75,000 hours Jill Martain-Qwest said that the IMA 20.0 capacity is 7,500 hours.

-- June 14, 2005 Information Received from Jil Martain (Qwest) Jill spoke with John Uhley and was advised that he still wanted to leave the CR active because it would be a nice to have from an audit perspective. John said that this CR is not a high priority.

February 16, 2005 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: There was no discussion on this CR.

July 22, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Jill Martain/Qwest stated that Qwest would distribute the ballot on July 27th, it is due back to Qwest on July 30th, and Qwest would email the initial prioritization list to the CLECs on August 3rd. There were no questions. The CR Originator was not on the conference bridge. There were no questions.

February 19, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion Excerpt (Attachments H & J): Judy Schultz/Qwest stated that she wanted to provide an update to the funding approval process that was discussed in the January CMP Systems Meeting. Judy referred everyone to Attachment J in the Distribution Package. She stated that all CRs are being re-evaluated and must be approved. Judy said that CRs could not be scheduled without approval. Judy stated that the CRs with an impact to the IMA interface would follow the existing prioritization process. Judy noted that the funding for IMA 15.0 and IMA 16.0 has been approved, as well as funding to begin work on IMA 17.0.

-- January Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: There were no comments or questions for this CR.

-- Clarification Meeting: 11/15/02

Attendees: Laurel Nolan-Qwest, Berkley Loggie-Qwest, Joan Pepper-Qwest, Monica Manning-Qwest, John Uhley-Complete Telecommunications

1.0 Introduction of Attendees Nolan-Qwest welcomed the meeting attendees and took attendance.

2.0 Review Requested Change Nolan-Qwest reviewed the Requested change as stated on the CR form.

3.0 Confirm Areas and Products Impacted Nolan-Qwest stated that the CR form stated that IMA-GUI would be effected. She asked Qwest-IT if IMA-EDI would also be impacted. Pepper-Qwest stated that IMA-EDI would also be effected and that Line sharing would be effected. Uhley-Complete Telecommunication stated that the issue is when something is cancelled. He states that it happens infrequently, but that they needed a correct list of pots splitter connects. Pepper-Qwest asked if he was asking for a query by range for circuit id or telephone or both. Uhley-Complete Telecommunications asked Qwest whatever was easiest. He stated that he thought that they system was already processing this information, but that it wasn't being displayed. Pepper-Qwest stated that the change was technically feasible.

4.0 Confirm personnel involved N/A

5.0 Confirm CLEC's Expectations Nolan-Qwest read the expectations as listed on the CR form.

6.0 N/A

7.0 Action Plan Nolan-Qwest informed Uhley-Complete Telecommunication that he would need to present the CR at the December 19th CMP Meeting.

CenturyLink Response

RE: SCR110702-01-Request to add ability for CLEC’s to get a list of circuit ID’s or Telephone#’s associated with active pots-splitter connections. Qwest has reviewed the information submitted as part of Change Request (SCR110702-01). Based upon the scope of this CR as agreed to in the Clarification Meeting, Qwest is able to provide an estimated Level of Effort (LOE) of 1300-2200 hours for this IMA Change Request.

At the next Monthly Systems CMP Meeting, CMP participants will be given the opportunity to comment on this Change Request and provide additional clarifications. Any clarifications and/or modifications identified at that time will be incorporated into Qwest's further evaluation of this Change Request.

This Change Request is an eligible candidate for the IMA 13.0 prioritization vote.

Sincerely, Qwest