Wholesale: Products & Services

Archived System CR SCR101403-01 Detail

Currently Sups are not allowed when the CIP and CSO fields have been populated.

Expected Deliverable:

McleodUSA is requesting that a SUP = 1 (Cancel) be allowed when the CIP and CSO fields are populated. McleodUSA expects this sup would continue to be flow through.

McleodUSA expects this be available in an IMA release.

Status History

Project Meetings

- December 8, 2004 Email Sent to McLeodUSA: Hi Michelle, Have you had an opportunity to check for closure of the CR referenced in the email below? Please let me know if you are okay to close the CR. Thank you, Peggy Esquibel-Reed Qwest CMP CRPM

- November 29, 2004 Email Sent to Michelle Sprague, McLeodUSA: Hi Michelle, This email is in regard to the McLeodUSA CMP CR of SCR101403-01 Allow Sup = 1 When Using CIP and CSO Fields This CR was submitted by Stephanie Prull when she was with McLeodUSA. This CR was deployed in the IMA 16.0 Release on October 18, 2004. I am not aware of any issues as a result of the deployment and ask if this CR can be closed. Eschelon has stated that it can close but want to get your approval to close as well. Will you please advise me if McLeodUSA is also ready to close the CR? I have attached a copy of the CR. Thank you, Peggy Esquibel-Reed Qwest CMP CRPM

November 17, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: John Gallegos/Qwest stated that Qwest will work offline with McLeod to close this CR.

--Original Message-- From: Johnson, Bonnie J. [mailto:bjjohnson@eschelon.com] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 7:28 AM To: Bonnie Johnson; cmpcr@qwest.com Cc: Johnson, Bonnie J.; Prull, Stephanie A.; Isaacs, Kimberly D. Subject: Systems CR Consdiered for Closure

In the last CMP meeting, Eschelon committed to get back to Qwest on some CRs I wanted to check on.

#8 Automation on Call Forwarding Features. OK to close.

#13 Allow Sup = 1 when using the CIP fields. OK to close.

#15 Border Towns Orders: Eschelon has not had an opportunity to test. Stephanie will check with McLeod.

#18 Virtual CSR. OK to close.

Let me know if you have questions.

Bonnie J. Johnson Director Carrier Relations Eschelon Telecom, Inc.

- November 17, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: John Gallegos/Qwest stated that Qwest will work offline with McLeod to close this CR.

- October 20, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Connie Winston/Qwest stated that this CR was deployed with the IMA 16.0 Release and will remain in CLEC Test for validation.

-- September 16, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Jill Martain/Qwest stated that this CR will deploy prior to the next monthly CMP Meeting.

- Combined Overview and IMA EDI Disclosure Documentation Walkthrough for IMA EDI Release 16.0 August 19, 2004

Attendees List* Anne Robberson - Qwest Crystal Soderlund - Qwest Dave Schleicher - Qwest Dianne Friend - Time Warner Ella Diamond - MCI Ellen McArthur - Qwest Emily Bayard - Cox James McCluskey - Accenture Jen Arnold - TDSMetrocom John Hansen - Qwest Judy DeRosier - Qwest Kim Isaacs - Eschelon Kyle Kirves - Qwest Linda Miles - Qwest Lori Langston - Qwest Maria Aceno - AT&T Mark Coyne - Qwest Michael Lopez - Qwest Pat Bratetic - Qwest Phyllis Burt - AT&T Qiana Davis - Qwest Rachel Law - Fibercom Randy Owen - Qwest Shon Higer - Qwest Peggy Esquibel-Reed - Qwest Stephanie Prull - Eschelon Vicki Dryden - Qwest *List is incomplete.

1. Introductions Kyle Kirves began the meeting by taking attendance and announcing the meeting purpose. Kyle handed out agendas and copies of the candidate overview document that were distributed with the notification announcing the walkthrough (copies attached). Kyle explained that the walkthrough would cover the candidates, the candidate impacts to the associated documentation, and the IMA EDI Disclosure Documentation overview.

Kyle introduced Anne Robberson to go over the first candidate, SCR101403-01 Allow Sup = 1 With CIP & CSO.

2. Review SCR101403-01 Allow Sup = 1 With CIP & CSO Anne Robberson reviewed the information provided in the candidate overview document circulated with the meeting agenda and the meeting notification announcement. Kyle opened the floor to Questions. Stephanie Prull asked if Sup 1s and Sup 2s will continue to flow without population of the fields as long as all other flow through conditions are met? Anne confirmed that yes, Sup 1s and Sup 2s will continue to flow without population of the fields as long as all other flow through conditions are met. Phyllis Burt asked if the CIP/CSO fields were still optional for VCSR. Shon Higer confirmed that if the request merges conditions, then there is no reason to use it. IMA will do and ownership check using information from the pending order. Kyle asked about PCAT updates. There were no PCAT updates for this candidate. Kyle asked about GUI documents updates. Dave Schleicher confirmed that the GUI documents will have corresponding updates around the usage of the CIP and CSO fields for the Users Guide. Kim Isaacs asked if the QLSOG will indicate that, if the CIP field is populated, you cannot use the SUP TYPE field? Judy DeRosier confirmed that the CIP is optional. Kyle moved discussion to the next candidate.

3. IMA EDI Disclosure Documentation Review Kyle conducted the review of the IMA EDI Disclosure Documentation. The commentary and questions around this segment are captured in a separate document with the Qwest responses to CLEC comments submitted through the CMP site for the convenience of having it in one spot. Please refer to Systems Notification number SYST.09.03.04.F.02009.IMAEDI16.0FinalTech Specs for details on the location of that document.

-- July 22, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Jill Martain/Qwest stated that the 16.0 Commitment List is included, in Attachment M of the July Systems CMP Distribution Package. There were no comments or questions.

-- February 19, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion Excerpt (Attachments H & J): Judy Schultz/Qwest stated that she wanted to provide an update to the funding approval process that was discussed in the January CMP Systems Meeting. Judy referred everyone to Attachment J in the Distribution Package. She stated that all CRs are being re-evaluated and must be approved. Judy said that CRs could not be scheduled without approval. Judy stated that the CRs with an impact to the IMA interface would follow the existing prioritization process. Judy noted that the funding for IMA 15.0 and IMA 16.0 has been approved, as well as funding to begin work on IMA 17.0.

- January Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Stephanie Prull/Eschelon stated that this CR was a high priority for Eschelon.

-- November 20, 2003 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Stephanie Prull/Eschelon reviewed the CR Description on behalf of McLeodUSA. There were no questions or comments. This CR will move to Presented Status.

-- Clarification Meeting - October 20, 2003 ATTENDEES: Stephanie Prull/McLeodUSA, Peggy Esquibel-Reed/Qwest, John Gallegos/Qwest, Shonna Pasionek/Qwest, Monica Manning/Qwest, Bob Hercher/Qwest, Nicole James/Qwest, Jim Recker/Qwest, Lynn Stecklein/Qwest, Jo Netherton/Qwest, Terri Kilker/Qwest CONFIRMED INTTERFACE: IMA Common correct, per Stephanie Prull/McLeodUSA CONFIRMED IMPACTED PRODUCTs: All is correct, per Stephanie Prull/McLeodUSA REVIEW CR DESCRIPTION: Peggy Esquibel-Reed/Qwest reviewed the description of the CR: Currently Sups are not allowed when the CIP and CSO fields have been populated. Expected Deliverable is that McleodUSA is requesting that a SUP = 1 (Cancel) be allowed when the CIP and CSO fields are populated. McleodUSA expects this sup would continue to be flow through. McleodUSA expects this be available in an IMA release. DISCUSSION: Peggy Esquibel-Reed/Qwest asked if the CR Title should indicate CIP and CSO Fields. Stephanie Prull/McLeodUSA responded yes. Peggy Esquibel-Reed/Qwest agreed to revise the CR Title to read 'Allow Sup = 1 When Using CIP and CSO Fields. Stephanie Prull/McLeodUSA stated that she agreed with the revised title. Peggy Esquibel-Reed/Qwest asked Stephanie (Prull) if she had additional information regarding the request. Stephanie Prull/McLeodUSA stated that the request is only for Sup 1 because Sup 1 is the only valid reason to sup when have CIP &/or CSO field. Stephanie stated that she is having an issue that when something is left off of the order and they use the CSO/CIP fields to sup the order. If the additional information, from the end user, causes the order to be stopped, another order is needed to be created in order to stop it. Stephanie stated that she does not want to have to issue the 'stop' order. Monica Manning/Qwest asked if the reject type that McLeod was receiving was a BPL reject or a Center reject. Stephanie Prull/McLeodUSA stated that a reject is not received because the fields are prohibited from being used. There were no other comments or questions.

CenturyLink Response

Qwest has reviewed the information submitted as part of Change Request SCR101403-01. Based upon the scope of this CR as agreed to in the Clarification Meeting (held October 20, 2003) Qwest is able to provide an estimated Level of Effort (LOE) of 1025 to 1130 hours for this IMA Change Request and SATE impacts of 185 to 235 hours.

At the November 20, 2003 Systems CMP Meeting, CMP participants will be given the opportunity to comment on this Change Request and provide additional clarifications. Any clarifications and/or modifications identified at that time will be incorporated into Qwest’s further evaluation of this Change Request.

This Change Request is eligible for the IMA 16..0 Prioritization.

Sincerely, Qwest