Archived System CR SCR100903-01 Detail |
Title: Responsibility for chargeable USOCs | |||||
CR Number |
Current Status Date |
Level of Effort |
Interface/ Release No. |
Area Impacted |
Products Impacted |
|
|||||
SCR100903-01 |
Withdrawn 5/21/2008 |
1000 - 1100 | 3/ | All |
Originator: Johnson, Bonnie |
Originator Company Name: Eschelon |
Owner: Coyne, Mark |
Director: |
CR PM: Stecklein, Lynn |
Description Of Change |
10/29/03 Eschelon and McLeod jointly sponsor this CR.
Currently CLECS are responsible for passing chargeable USOCs for Non Recurring Charges. Current examples are Additional Listings, Ani Swap Charges, Tagging the DMARC charges, etc
McLeod USA is requesting that the CLEC no longer have to pass a chargeable USOC and that the Qwest flow through, billing, and service centers be responsible for applying the correct billing USOCs to the service order. This request is for Non recurring type charges or charges for directory listings.
|
Status History |
Date | Action | Description |
10/9/2003 | CR Submitted | |
10/13/2003 | CR Acknowledged | |
10/17/2003 | Clarification Meeting Scheduled | |
10/20/2003 | Clarification Meeting Held | |
10/20/2003 | Status Changed | Status changed to clarification |
10/30/2003 | Info Received From CLEC | Examples received from McLeod |
11/11/2003 | Draft Response Issued | |
11/20/2003 | Status Changed | Status changed to presented |
11/20/2003 | Discussed at Monthly CMP Meeting | Discussed at the November CMP Meeting - See Attachment B |
2/4/2004 | Release Ranking | 16.0 Prioritization- Ranked #10 out of 50 |
3/1/2004 | Release Ranking | IMA 16.0 Revised Prioritization, Late Adder Ranking - #10 out of 51 |
3/3/2004 | General Meeting Held | Additional clarification meeting held |
8/3/2004 | Release Ranking | 17.0 Prioritization- Ranked #16 out of 41 |
7/7/2005 | Additional Information | QPP will benefit with the implementation of this CR |
8/1/2005 | Release Ranking | 19.0 Prioritization- Ranked #17 out of 26 |
2/27/2006 | Release Ranking | 20.0 Prioritization- Ranked #15 (tied) out of 21 |
7/7/2006 | Status Changed | Status Changed to Pending Prioritization, for 21.0 Release. |
11/27/2006 | Release Ranking | IMA 21.0 Late Adder Ranking - #16 out of 20 |
4/2/2007 | Release Ranking | IMA 22.0 Prioritization- Ranked #14 (tie) out of 18 |
8/15/2007 | Discussed at Monthly CMP Meeting | Discussed at the August Systems CMP Meeting - See Attachment N in the Distribution Package |
1/21/2008 | Release Ranking | IMA 23.0 Prioritization- Ranked #5 out of 10 |
3/3/2008 | Release Ranking | IMA 24.0 Prioritization- Ranked #5 out of 5 |
5/8/2008 | Status Changed | Status changed to Pending Withdrawal |
Project Meetings |
5/21/08 Systems CMP Meeting Mark Coyne-Qwest stated that Integra and McLeod requested that this CR be withdrawn. 5/8/08 E-mail From Integra Hi Lynn! Steph did submit this LSR when at McLeod and she said to withdraw the CR. Thanks! Bonnie J. Johnson| Director Carrier Relations direct 612.436.6218 | fax 612.436.6318 730 Second Avenue S | Suite 900 Minneapolis, MN 55402 bjjohnson@integratelecom.com --Original Message-- From: Stecklein, Lynn [mailto:Lynn.Stecklein@qwest.com] Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 1:30 PM To: Johnson, Bonnie J.; julia.redman-carter@mcleodusa.com Cc: New Cr, Cmp Subject: SCR100903-01 Responsiblity for chargeable USOCs Hi Bonnie and Julia, We are in the process of creating requirements for the candidates in IMA Release 24. One of the candidates, SCR100903-01 Responsibility for chargeable USOCs, appears to have much work already done. The initial description was: 10/29/03 Eschelon and McLeod jointly sponsor this CR. Currently CLECS are responsible for passing chargeable USOCs for Non Recurring Charges. Current examples are Additional Listings, Ani Swap Charges, Tagging the DMARC charges, etc McLeod USA is requesting that the CLEC no longer have to pass a chargeable USOC and that the Qwest flow through, billing, and service centers be responsible for applying the correct billing USOCs to the service order. This request is for Non recurring type charges or charges for directory listings. We believe the requested functionality already exists for Additional Listings. We need some clarification regarding what is meant by "ANI Swap". I have checked internally and no one is familiar with this process. Possibly we know this by different terminology. Can we get more information on this? For Tagging the DMARC requests, NW1 or NW2 USOCs could only be added to service orders by Qwest via a remark in the Remarks section of the LSR to tag the DMARC. Since Remarks are free form, Qwest would be unable to flow these requests mechanically. The only way of accommodating this request would be to drop these requests for manual handling and implementing a process change that would require Qwest SDCs to add these USOCs to the service order. If this is something that Eschelon and McLeod want to pursue, it should be handled as a process change request rather than a system change request. We also have existing functionality to add the Non Recurring USOCs for Intercept or Transfer of Calls and number change charges. Thanks, Lynn Stecklein Qwest Wholesale CMP This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments. 8/15/07 Systems CMP Meeting Mark Coyne-Qwest stated that IMA 23.0 is scheduled in April of 2008. Note: Kim Isaacs-Eschelon said that candidate number 7 - SCR121306-01 Enable the EOS Field on the Directory Listing Form is on the Commitment List for IMA 22.0. Peggy Esquibel-Reed-Qwest stated that we will remove that candidate from the IMA 23.0 list. Peggy Esquibel-Reed-Qwest stated that the Prioritization Instructions and spreadsheet candidate list are included in this attachment. She stated that there are 11 candidates on the list. She said that Qwest and the CLEC ranks each CR on the list by providing a point value from 1 through 11. Peggy said that the highest point value (11) should be assigned to the CR that Qwest and the CLECs wish to be implemented first. The next point value (10) should be assigned to the CR that Qwest and the CLECs wish to be implemented second and so on. The lowest point value (1) should be assigned to the least desired CR. Peggy stated that the total points will be calculated by the Qwest CMP Manager and the results will be distributed to the CLECs via mailout within 2 business days following the submission of the ranking. Peggy reviewed the timelines associated with prioritization: - Qwest Re-Distributes the Prioritization Form by 5 pm MT on August 20th - The Completed Prioritization Form will be submitted to cmpcr@qwest.com by 5 pm MT on August 23rd. - Qwest e-mails the Initital Prioritization Form by 5 pm MT on August 27th. - Peggy asked if everyone would like to provide their top 2 candidates. Kim Isaacs-Eschelon stated that their top candidate is #9 SCR062906-03 Allow End State Ordering for Resale POTS Service. Integra – no response Jeff Sonnier-Sprint said that he would send an e-mail with this information. Note: 8/17/07 - E-mail received from Sprint with top 2 candidates: 1. Change of usage of CCNA for Sprint on LNP Orders 2. Allow NP Bus Name on Residential Account TDS – no response Verizon Business – no response Sue Wright-XO Communications stated that she had nothing to share. Janet Harper-Bresnan Communications stated that she did not have anything to share. McLeod – no response Synchronous – no response Peggy Esquibel-Reed-Qwest stated that Qwest’s top 2 candidates are #10 SCR110106-02 Allow NP Bus Name on Residential Account and #11 SCR071307-01 Add TSP Reject Code. 2/16/05 Systems CMP Meeting - IMA 18.0 Discussion There was no discussion on this CR. 7/22/04 CMP Systems Meeting Jill Martain/Qwest stated that Qwest would distribute the ballot on July 27th, it is due back to Qwest on July 30th, and Qwest would email the initial prioritization list to the CLECs on August 3rd. There were no questions. Kim Isaacs/Eschelon stated that this was a medium for Eschelon. 3/19/04 CMP Systems Meeting Kim Isaacs/Eschelon stated that this CR is a medium to high priority for Eschelon. 3/3/04 Additional Clarification Call Attendees: Steph Prull - Eschelon, Kim Isaacs - Eschelon, Bonnie Johnson - Eschelon, Conrad Evans - Qwest, Denise Martinez - Qwest, Lee Gomez - Qwest, Lynn Stecklein - Qwest Discussion: Denise Martinez - Qwest asked if this request requires both mechanical and manual support for the application of these non-recurring charges. Stephanie Prull - Eschelon stated that they want both and said that if it did not flow through they would want manual. Denise Martinez/Qwest asked does the request specify Facility Based Listings and stated that our current and any previous processes do not require any USOCs to be passed for Facility Based Listing requests. Denise asked if they still feel that listings are an issue we need examples. Denise stated that we can definitely provide the non-recurring charges for requests other than Facility Based Listings. Stephanie Prull - Eschelon stated that they have examples. Denise Martinez/Qwest said that she wanted to share that because the CLECs have requested this functionality when Qwest applies these non-recurring charges, there will be no PIA entry provided to indicate a difference between what was requested vs. what was ordered. Steph Prull/Eschelon said that as long as they knew and could build business rules around those entries. Denise Martinez/Qwest said that the request mentions tagging the DMARC and asked if it was for Unbundled Loop only or other products. Denise stated that Unbundled Loop does not require USOCs be passed and that the existing process calls to mark as MH (Manual Handling) and enter a Remark regarding tagging. All Products will be noted on this request. 11/20/03 CMP Systems Meeting Stephanie Prull/Eschelon reviewed the description of change. Eschelon is requesting that the CLEC no longer have to pass a chargeable USOC and that Qwest flow through to billing and the service centers be responsible for applying the correct billing USOC to the service order. The LOE for this CR is 1000 to 1100 hours and that the status will change to presented. This CR is an eligible 16.0 candidate. E-mail received from Stephanie Prull/McLeod 10/30/01 Yep here are some actual USOCs I'd like for Qwest to look at. CLT NCK CDD NRCSC A1W1X A1WAX A1W3X A1WSX A1W9X A1WTX A1SPL A1SPS RNCRN RNCSP RNCEP CNEPG RNCSP RNCSS NPU NLT This is a few that I am aware of. Let me know if this helps. Steph Stephanie Prull McleodUSA StarQuality Certified OSS Manager - Qwest Systems Phone 319-790-2101 Email: stephanie.prull@mcleodusa.com Website: www.mcleodusa.com --Original Message-- From: Stecklein, Lynn [mailto:Lynn.Stecklein@qwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 4:00 PM To: Prull, Stephanie A. Subject: RE: Chargable Usocs Steph, Thanks for the quick response...I sent these to John Gallegos and he said that he would take what you have provided and run with them...He also wanted to know if you had actual examples of these situations. Thanks! --Original Message-- From: Prull, Stephanie A. [mailto:Stephanie.Prull@mcleodusa.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:12 PM To: Lynn Stecklein (E-mail) Subject: Chargable Usocs Lynn, Here are my examples Referral Recordings Tag the DMARC All Directory Listing USOCs Aniswap Charges Vanity Number Charges Thanks Steph Stephanie Prull McleodUSA StarQuality Certified OSS Manager - Qwest Systems Phone 319-790-2101 Email: stephanie.prull@mcleodusa.com Website: www.mcleodusa.com NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender via e-mail. 10/20/03 Clarification Meeting Attendees: Stephanie Prull/McLeod, John Gallegos - Qwest, Jo Netherton - Qwest, James Recker - Qwest, Nicole James - Qwest, Shonna Pasionek - Qwest, Bob Herscher - Qwest, Terry Kilker - Qwest Review Description of CR McLeod is requesting that the CLEC no longer have to pass a chargeable USOC and that the Qwest flow through, billing, and service centers be responsible for applying the correct billing USOCs to the service order. McLeod USA is requesting that the CLEC no longer have to pass a chargeable USOC and that the Qwest flow through, billing, and service centers be responsible for applying the correct billing USOCs to the service order. Discussion: Stephanie Prull/McLeod stated that they want to get away from having to send the USOC for non-recurring charges. She stated that they don't want to eliminate the resale form but just do away with sending both John Gallegos/Qwest asked if this pertains to the HB req type and asked if McLeod could send examples. Stephanie Prull/McLeod said she would send examples and also that they don't have a problem with the HB req type, only Facility based. Confirm Areas and Products impacted This request is for Non recurring type charges or charges for directory listings. Identify/Confirm CLECs Expectation McLeod USA is requesting that the CLEC no longer have to pass a chargeable USOC and that the Qwest flow through, billing, and service centers be responsible for applying the correct billing USOCs to the service order. Establish Action Plan McLeod will present will this CR at the November 20th CMP systems meeting.
|
CenturyLink Response |
DRAFT RESPONSE November 11, 2003 RE: SCR100903-01 Qwest has reviewed the information submitted as part of Change Request SCR100903-01. Based upon the scope of this CR as agreed to in the Clarification Meeting (held October 20, 2003) Qwest is able to provide an estimated Level of Effort (LOE) of 1000 to 1100 hours for this IMA Change Request and SATE impacts of 185 to 235 hours. At the November 20, 2003 Systems CMP Meeting, CMP participants will be given the opportunity to comment on this Change Request and provide additional clarifications. Any clarifications and/or modifications identified at that time will be incorporated into Qwest’s further evaluation of this Change Request. This Change Request is eligible for the IMA 16.0 Prioritization. Sincerely, Qwest
|
Information Current as of 1/11/2021