Wholesale: Products & Services

Archived System CR SCR051503-01 Detail

List Name - separated into LastName, FirstName, Title of Address, Title of Lineage

List Address - separated into SANO, SASF, SASD, SASN, SASS, City, STate

Service Address - separated into SANO, SASF, SASD, SASN, SASS, City, STate, LD1, LV1, LD2, LV2

Additions made during clarification call: LISTED NAME: DES (Designation) and NICK (Nickname)

LISTED ADDRESS: FLOOR, BLDG (Building)

SERVICE ADDRESS: LD3 (Location Designator 3), LV3 (Location Value3)

Expected Deliverable: Add additional fields to the electronic DL Verification Report.

Status History

Project Meetings

Connie Winston/Qwest stated that this request was completed on 8/20/04 and asked if Comcast was ok to close. Linda Minesola/Comcast said that this request could be closed.

8/18/04 Systems CMP Meeting

Connie Winston/Qwest stated that this CR will deploy on 8/20/04. Stephanie Prull/Eschelon asked if the fields were listed in the CR. Connie Winston/Qwest said that the fields should be listed in the CR.

3/8/04 e-mail received from USLink

Lynn,

USLink will be supporting Eschelon, we will support the fixed format for electronic DL verification reports.

Let me know if you have any questions and thanks for being patient with us!

Thanks

Julie Pickar

USLink

218-568-2039

3/8/04 Additional Clarification Meeting

Introduction of Attendees: Donna Osborne-Miller, Stephanie Prull - Eschelon, Cheryl Peterson - AT&T, Nancy Sanders - Comcast, Julie Pickar - U S Link, Lee Gomez - Qwest, John Gallegos - Qwest, Lynn Stecklein - Qwest

Lynn Stecklein/Qwest stated that the purpose of this meeting was to follow up with the CLEC Community on how they wanted to proceed with this CR. Lynn said that in the January CMP Systems Meeting Lee Gomez/Qwest provided additional information on the fixed field format and the additional fields to the electronic DL Verification Report. The CLEC Community stated in that meeting that they wanted to discuss this CR internally within their Companies.

Lee Gomez/Qwest stated that she wanted to make sure that the CLECs understood the difference between the fixed field format vs. the comma delimited format. Lee also stated that she wanted to make sure that everyone understood that these files would be huge and wanted to make sure that they could handle the capacity of the files.

Nancy Sanders/Comcast stated that Comcast would like the fixed field format.

Stephanie Prull/Eschelon stated that Eschelon would like the fixed field format.

Donna Osborne-Miller/AT&T stated that she wanted to research further.

Lee Gomez/Qwest stated that Qwest sent out a list of fields that would be available and wanted to make sure that everyone understood the intent of the verification proof changes field additions. Lee stated that we can send every field or pare it down.

Stephanie Prull/Eschelon asked if a separate report could be generated.

Lee Gomez/Qwest stated that the verification report is still available to the CLECs.

Stephanie Prull/Eschelon stated that they would like to receive it all and the more the better.

Nancy Sanders/Comcast stated that they were trying to automate and would like to receive it all.

Julie Pickar/U S Link stated that she needed to check internally to determine what U S Link wanted to do and would get back with Lynn Stecklein with their decision.

Lee Gomez/Qwest asked if there were any other questions and there were none.

2/10/04 e-mail from Comcast Lynn:

I will be taking ownership of this on behalf of Comcast. We would like the fixed field format.

Nancy Sanders Carrier Manager Comcast Corp. 5800 S. Quebec Street. Englewood, CO 80111 (720) 267-8321 nancysanders@cable.comcast.com

1/22/04 CMP Systems Meeting

Lee Gomez/Qwest stated that this CR requested additional fields be added to the electronic DL verification report. Lee stated that it is currently in comma-delimited format and looking to make it a fixed field format. Lee stated that the field length might be 2,000 + characters long and asked the CLECs if they would have a capacity issue. Lee asked if it would be better to stay with a comma-delimited field and add new fields. Nancy Sanders/Comcast asked what fields would be available. Nancy stated that she would need to discuss this internally but noted that comma delimited works for AT&T today. Nancy stated that it is important that AT&T sees new fields. Lee Gomez/Qwest said that she did not have a list in front of her but would include any fields on the form. Lee stated that she would provide a list of all fields to the CLECs. Nancy Sanders/Comcast stated that she would share the list internally and provide the information back to Qwest. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon stated that all the CLECs could respond. Lee Gomez/Qwest asked if the decision is for the comma-delimited format. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon stated that it sounds like the way to go.

2/6/04 E-mail sent to the CLEC Community

The purpose of this notification is to provide information that was requested in the January CMP Systems Meeting associated with SCR051503-01 (Add additional fields to the electronic DL Verification Report). During the meeting Qwest provided an update on the new fixed field format. Qwest stated that this CR requested additional fields be added to the electronic DL verification report. Qwest also stated that it is currently in comma-delimited format and that we are looking to make it a fixed field format. The field length might be 2,000 + characters long and Qwest asked the CLECs if they would have a capacity issue. The CLECs stated that they would need to discuss this internally and asked if Qwest could provide a list of the fields. You will find a list of those fields and a current copy of the change request attached for your review.

Thanks,

Lynn Stecklein CRPM - Systems 303 382-5770 Lynn.Stecklein@qwest.com

CMP Monthly Meeting July 17, 2003

SCR051503-01 Determine solution (option 1/40/80 hours, option 2/ 100/200 hours, option 3 100-200 hours) (SCR051503-01 Additional fields to DL Verification Report) Sharon Van Meter/AT&T stated that there had been an Ad-Hoc call with the CLEC Community on this CR and that AT&T and Qwest wanted to make sure that all CLECs understood this CR. Laurel Nolan/Qwest stated that the major change was from a common delineated file to a fixed link format file. She reviewed what that would look like. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T asked if they wanted to make sure that everyone else was ok with this. Laurel Nolan/Qwest stated that the LOE would not change, and the timeframe would be around IMA 15.0 Sharon Van Meter/AT&T stated that because this was not part of IMA, could it be implemented sooner. Laurel Nolan/Qwest stated that she would talk to the SMEs about scheduling and report back. Connie Winston/Qwest noted that the IMA December release has the listing resources booked. Sharon Van Meter/AT&T stated that she understood, but that they would like the change implemented as soon as possible.

July 11, 2003 Ad-Hoc Call

Meeting attendees: Sharon Van Meter-AT&T, Missy Woods- Comcast, Lane Jones-Qwest, Lee Gomez-Qwest, Laurel Nolan-CRPM Qwest, Kim Issack-Eschelon, Stephanie Prull-McLeod USA.

Nolan-Qwest welcomed the attendees and stated that the purpose of the call was to discuss the change with the CLEC Community beucase of it's impact to the Electronic Verification Proof. She then asked Gomez-Qwest to discuss the changes.

Gomez-Qwest stated that one of the major changes was from a comma delinated format to a fixed field format. She stated that Qwest would also be adding the additional fields that are supplied back to the CLECs. She stated that AT&T had requested certain fields and that through enhancements to the DLIS system, Qwest was able to provide additional fields back to the CLECs. She stated that the reformated file would be easier to reconcile with the fixed field. Van Meter-AT&T stated that all the information is provided in the CR. Woods-Comcast asked if the information was in a fixed format could it be viewed in excell. Gomez-Qwest stated that it could.

Nolan-Qwest asked if there were any other questions or concerns. She stated that the CR would be discussed in the July CMP Meeting and would receive feedback from other CLECs. She also noted that the LOE was the same for this CR, 100-200 hours.

Meeting adjourned.

July 1, 2003 Additional CLEC Call

Meeting attendees: Sharon Van Meter-AT&T, Missy Woods- Comcast, Shonna Pashionic-Qwest, Lane Jones-Qwest, Lee Gomez-Qwest, Laurel Nolan-CRPM Qwest

Nolan-Qwest stated that when Qwest was looking at the CR submitted by AT&T they noticed determined that it would be helpful to add some additional fields. She stated that Lee Gomez-Qwest would explain. Gomez-Qwest discussed the parsed OBF field format. Today we send out in a comma delinated file, but think that it would be easier to send out in a fixed format. Gave the example of the name. Reviewed how it would work if it was not a fixed format. She explanined that the fix format would make the same information apear in each row and column. She stated that this would be the case if there was information in there or not. Jones-Qwest asked if change to this CR would also give the CLECs more information. Gomez-Qwest stated that this would be all the information that the CLECs send Qwest then it would be sent back to the CLEC. Wood- What would the LOE be for the comma delinated vs. fixed format. Gomez- Fixed format is easier to program to and would be the same LOE, 100-200 hours. Van Meter- Need to have an ad-hoc call with the CLECs since this would effect. Nolan-Qwest stated that she would send availability to Wood and Van Meter and then a 5 day notification to the CLEC Community. Van Meter-AT&T stated that she thinks it would be a good idea to get feedback from all CLECs since it will affect everyone. Gomez-Qwest any other questions. None. Meeting adjourned.

June CMP Meeting- excerpt from Meeting Minutes June 17, 2003

SCR051503-01 Add Additional Fields To The Electronic DL Verification Report (originated by AT&T) Sharon Van Meter/AT&T stated that AT&T has submitted this CR on behalf of Missy Wood at Comcast. Sharon stated that Missy is not in attendance but if there were any questions, she would take them to Missy. Connie Winston/Qwest stated that Qwest has no questions and noted that the level of effort is provided. Laurel Nolan/Qwest stated that the Clarification Call was held and based on that discussion, Qwest has provided two LOE’s. Laurel stated that a decision is needed, by AT&T, as to which option Qwest is to move forward with. Laurel stated that the LOE’s are the 40 to 80 hour option and the 100 to 200 hour option. Connie Winston/Qwest stated that there would be a read out at the July CMP Meeting for the decision. There were no additional questions or comments.

Clarification Meeting May 28, 2003

Meeting attendees: Sharon Van Meter-AT&T, Missy Woods- Comcast, Shonna Pashionic-Qwest, Lane Jones-Qwest, Lee Gomez-Qwest, Laurel Nolan-CRPM Qwest

Review of Description of change: Nolan-Qwest reviewed the change listed on the CR. She asked if there were any additions or changes to this. Gomez-Qwest stated that there are other fileds like nickname and designated and asked if Comcast also wanted these added. Woods-Comcast stated that she would want those fields. Gomez-Qwest she asked if Woods wanted these sepearated. Woods-Comcast stated that she did. Gomez-Qwest stated that if DLIS was seperated to show all the fields. She asked if Comcast wanted this on the electronic proof. Woods-Comcast stated that they wanted the information to do a database match up. Gomez-Qwest stated that Qwest wanted to make sure that they were making all the changes that Comcast wanted. Woods-Comcast suggested that Qwest do two LOEs. 1) for what the CR was requesting plus nickname, designation, LD3, and LV3 and 2) Everything that's currently on the order. Gomez-Qwest stated that Qwest could do two LOEs.

Products, Interfaces, and Areas impacted: Nolan-Qwest reviewed that ICDF Collocation was listed on the CR. Van Meter-AT&T stated that it should just be FBDL. Nolan-Qwest stated that she would change the CR products. Nolan-Qwest then reviewed that the interface was Directory Listings.

Nolan-Qwest asked if there were any other questions, concerns, or additions. None.

Meeting adjourned.

CMP Monthly Meeting- excerpt from meeting minutes May 22, 2003

Walk On CR: SCR051503-01 Add additional fields to the electronic DL Verification Report (originated by AT&T/Comcast) Sharon Van Meter/AT&T reviewed the CR and stated that it also related to the verification report. She stated that she did not want to delay the implementation of the Cox CR (SCR041803-01), but that they were related. She stated that Missy Woods (AT&T/Comcast) stated that the information is required on the directory listings order form, but that the CLECs do not receive the information back on the report. Van Meter stated that the Clarification Call is scheduled for Tuesday. Kit Thomte/Qwest stated that if Delynn Ball (Cox) wanted to attend the Clarification Call for the AT&T CR, he could contact the CRPM, Laurel Nolan.

CenturyLink Response

June 11, 2003

RE: SCR051503-01 Add additional fields to the electronic DL Verification Report

Qwest has reviewed the information submitted as part of Change Request (SCR051503-01). Based upon the scope of this CR as agreed to in the Clarification Meeting (held May 28, 2003) Qwest is able to provide two estimated Level of Effort (LOE) for this Directory Listings Change Request. The LOE for the addition of List Listed Name - separated into LastName, FirstName, Title of Address, Title of Lineage, DES (Designation) and NICK (Nickname), List Address - separated into SANO, SASF, SASD, SASN, SASS, City, State, FLOOR, BLDG (Building), and Service Address - separated into SANO, SASF, SASD, SASN, SASS, City, STate, LD1, LV1, LD2, LV2, LD3 (Location Designator 3), LV3 (Location Value3) would be 40-80 hours for this change. The LOE for the rewrite of the Electronic VP is 100-200 hours.

At the June Systems CMP Meeting, CMP participants will be given the opportunity to comment on this Change Request and provide additional clarifications. Any clarifications and/or modifications identified at that time will be incorporated into Qwest's further evaluation of this Change Request. The participants will also be asked to determine which solution they would like to move forward with for this change.

Sincerely, Qwest