Wholesale: Products & Services

Archived System CR SCR040204-03 Detail

IMA to implement edit to meeting the following criteria:

FDT XX is only applicable on requests with ACT = T (which produce a T&F order).

FDT XX is only available for Non-Designed business customers.

FDT XX is to be used only if the T&F order has the same due date. DDDO must equal DDD

FDT XX should only be used if the TN on the T&F orders is remaining the same.

IMA to disallow any other alpha value other than XX in DFDT field

Status History

Project Meetings

Jill Martain/Qwest stated that this CR deployed on October 17th and would like to close this CR. There was no objection. This CR is closed.

11/16/05 Systems CMP Meeting

Jill Martain/Qwest stated that this CR deployed on 10/17/05. Lynn Hankins/Covad stated that she would like this CR to remain in CLEC Test for testing purposes.

10/19/05 Systems CMP Meeting This CR deployed on 10/17/05 and will remain in CLEC Test.

Combined Overview and IMA EDI Disclosure Documentation Walkthrough for IMA EDI Release 18.0

August 10, 2005 8:00 am

Location: CONFERENCE BRIDGE ONLY Conference Bridge: 1-888-725-8686 Conference ID: 4317009

Attendees List* Anders Ingemarson - Qwest Angela Stewart - Qwest Angie Thompson - Weiser Anne Robberson - Qwest Brian Caywood - Qwest Chris Terrell - AT&T Chuck Anderson - Qwest Cim Chambers - Qwest Dave Schleicher - Qwest Denise Martinez - Qwest Diane Burt - AT&T Dianne Friend - Time Warner Gary Berroa - Qwest John Sanclaria - Qwest Judy DeRosier - Qwest Lynn Stecklein - Qwest Mark Coyne - Qwest Mark Haynes - Qwest Michael Lopez - Qwest Michelle Thacker - Qwest Pat Bratetic - Qwest Russ Urevig - Qwest Sandie Tekavec -Qwest Shon Higer - Qwest Stephanie Prull - Eschelon

*List may be incomplete. 1. Introductions Kyle Kirves began the meeting by taking attendance and announcing the meeting purpose. The meeting notice included copies of the agenda and the candidate overview document. Kyle explained that the walkthrough would cover the candidates, the candidate impacts to the associated documentation, and the IMA EDI Disclosure Documentation overview.

Kyle introduced Shon Higer to go over the first candidate, SCR040204-03 IMA to allow Frame Due Time of XX.

2. Reviews SCR040204-03 - IMA to allow Frame Due Time of XX Shon Higer reviewed the information provided in the candidate overview document circulated with the meeting agenda and the meeting notification announcement.

Kyle opened the floor to Questions.

Stephanie Prull asked if in the LSR and LR forms would show corresponding changes. Shon answered that, yes, the changes would correspond.

There were no other questions.

Kyle asked about PCAT updates.

Gary Berroa covered the changes to the PCAT, specifically that the Ordering Overview PCAT would incorporate the changes around the Frame Due Time description.

Kyle asked if there were any other questions. No questions, so Kyle moved discussion to the next candidate.

2/16/05 Systems CMP Meeting

Jill Martain-Qwest stated that this CR is a high priority for Qwest.

7/22/04 CMP Systems Meeting Jill Martain/Qwest stated that Qwest would distribute the ballot on July 27th, it is due back to Qwest on July 30th, and Qwest would email the initial prioritization list to the CLECs on August 3rd. There were no questions.

Jill Martain/Qwest reviewed the CR and stated that this is medium for Qwest. Liz Balvin/MCI asked if this was for disconnects and new connects. Jill Martain/Qwest stated that it is just for T&Fs, for business services. Kim Isaacs/Eschelon stated that this is medium for Eschelon.

4/22/04 CMP Systems Meeting

Qiana Davis/Qwest presented that CR description. Qiana stated that the DFDT XX value will cause programming on the T and F order to "held" until a field technician, dispatcher, or other employee calls to have the order worked. Qiana also stated that IMA will edit to meet the following criteria: FDT XX in only applicable on requests with ACT = T which produces a T & F order, FDT XX is only available for Non-Designed business customers, FDT XX is to be used only if the T& F order has the same due date and DDDO must equal DDD, FDT XX should only be used if the TN on the T& F orders is remaining the same and IMA will disallow any other alpha value other than XX in the DFDT field. Qiana stated that a bullet will be added to the description to state that this is allowed only on non-dispatchable orders. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon asked if this is applicable only when you have ACT=T and all the criteria mentioned.

Qiana Davis/Qwest stated that all criteria must be met to be held.

Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon stated that the scenario would apply to these products, TOS, account type, non- dispatchable and with no impact to other products.

5/3/04 Revision to Minutes from Eschelon - Qiana Davis/Qwest said yes and that no other products or use of this field for other reasons is impacted. Liz Balvin/MCI asked if this request was being implemented to make sure that the F order is not worked before the T order so that there would be no customer outage. Qiana Davis/Qwest said yes. Stephanie Prull/Eschelon asked if there was any other alternative to identify option besides the XX in the DFDT field. Stephanie stated that some vendors don’t allow alphas in this field.

Qiana Davis/Qwest stated that the XX is required. Qiana Davis/Qwest stated that a Level 3 notification was be sent for the manual solution that will drop the order for manual handling with a remark that states ‘Work F order after T order is worked. Stephanie Prull/Eschelon asked if they could use the manual solution. Qiana Davis/Qwest stated that we would prefer you code for alphas. Cheryl Peterson/AT&T asked if they could do from and to for a UNE-P move.

Jim Recker/Qwest stated that you will continue using the process as in the past and that this request is an addition to the process. Jim said that if the customer is in the same wire center, they can request dual service.

Cheryl Peterson/AT&T stated that she did not remember the exact details but the scenario was that the F order was being disconnected on an auto batch at 12:01 a.m. and the customer was our of service most of the day. Cheryl asked if this request would ensure that the technician is aware of both orders.

James Recker/Qwest stated that this is only applicable to non-dispatchable orders and that the orders would be worked at the same time. Liz Balvin/MCI asked if the mechanization in place will accommodate a flow through order, non-dispatchable and the mechanism will be in place to identify that the T&F are coordinated.

James Recker/Qwest said yes.

This CR is in presented status.

4/14/03 Clarification Meeting

Introductions Qiana Davis - Qwest, Bob Hercher - Qwest, Anne Robberson - Qwest, James Recker - Qwest, Mark Gonzales - Qwest, Lynn Stecklein - Qwest

Review Description of Change Lynn Stecklein/Qwest reviewed the description of change. MA to allow DFDT to be populated with XX only on ACT = T where a T&F order is generated. The DFDT XX value will cause programming on the T and F order to "held" until a field technician, dispatcher, or other employee calls to have the order worked

IMA to implement edit to meeting the following criteria:

FDT XX is only applicable on requests with ACT = T (which produce a T&F order).

FDT XX is only available for Non-Designed business customers.

FDT XX is to be used only if the T&F order has the same due date. DDDO must equal DDD

FDT XX should only be used if the TN on the T&F orders is remaining the same.

IMA to disallow any other alpha value other than XX in DFDT field

Confirm Areas & Products Impacted Qiana Davis/Qwest confirmed that the products impacted are are UNE-P and Resale. Qiana stated that the interface impacted is IMA Common and that this impacts non-designed Business Customers only.

Discussion

Establish Action Plan Qwest will present this change request in the April 22 CMP Sytems Meeting.

CenturyLink Response

April 20, 2004

RE: SCR040204-03 IMA to allow Frame Due Time of XX

Qwest has reviewed the information submitted as part of Change Request (SCR040204-03). Based upon the scope of this CR as agreed to in the Clarification Meeting (held April 14, 2004) Qwest is able to provide an estimated Level of Effort (LOE) of 1800 to 2500 hours for this IMA Change Request with SATE impacts of 150 to 200 hours There is no impact to SATE.

At the next Monthly Systems CMP Meeting, CMP participants will be given the opportunity to comment on this Change Request and provide additional clarifications. Any clarifications and/or modifications identified at that time will be incorporated into Qwest's further evaluation of this Change Request.

This Change Request is an eligible candidate for the IMA 17.0 prioritization vote.

Sincerely, Qwest