Wholesale: Products & Services

Archived System CR SCR022703-10 Detail

AT&T requests that QWEST system generate this ILEC specific requirement based on the LSOG LTOS (LSOG field not currently supported by QWEST).

For example:

- QWEST should use the LTOS (Line Type of Service) field on the RS form.

- QWEST has an ILEC specific requirement that we supply the LINE LEVEL USOC on the RS Form.

- QWEST should system generate this ILEC specific data based on the LSOG LTOS field instead of requiring CLECs to reported this information in a different format.

Status History

Project Meetings

- July 22, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Jill Martain/Qwest stated that Qwest would distribute the ballot on July 27th, it is due back to Qwest on July 30th, and Qwest would email the initial prioritization list to the CLECs on August 3rd. There were no questions. Donna Osborne-Miller/AT&T stated this was low for AT&T.

- February 19, 2004 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion Excerpt (Attachments H & J): Judy Schultz/Qwest stated that she wanted to provide an update to the funding approval process that was discussed in the January CMP Systems Meeting. Judy referred everyone to Attachment J in the Distribution Package. She stated that all CRs are being re-evaluated and must be approved. Judy said that CRs could not be scheduled without approval. Judy stated that the CRs with an impact to the IMA interface would follow the existing prioritization process. Judy noted that the funding for IMA 15.0 and IMA 16.0 has been approved, as well as funding to begin work on IMA 17.0.

-- January Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Donna Osborne-Miller/AT&T stated that this is a low priority for AT&T Consumer and a high priority for AT&T Business.

August 21, 2003 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Phyllis Burt/AT&T stated that their interest in this CR was low.

-- April 3, 2003 Email received from AT&T: Hi Peggy, Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. Yes, the revised version is ok with me. Thanks, Phyllis

April 3, 2003 Email sent to Donna O-M and Phyllis B. at AT&T: Good Morning -- Have you made a decision as to the revision of this CR? Please advise. Thanks, Peggy Esquibel-Reed Qwest CRPM -- Systems pesquib@qwest.com

- March 28, 2003 Email sent to AT&T: Hi Donna & Phyllis -- During the March Systems CMP Meeting there was discussion regarding this CR, SCR022703-10 (System Generate QWEST Specific information). During that discussion I believe there was agreement that this CR was for the LTOS Field only. An Action Item was created, and assigned to Phyllis Burt, to send Qwest a revised CR. I have not as yet received the revision. I know everyone is extremely busy....so....I have made a proposed draft revision to the CR. I am attaching a copy of the current CR and a copy of the draft revision. Revision's were made to the CR Title and Description only, the remaining text will stay the same. Please review the proposed revision and send me your concurrence OR if changes are needed, feel free do make them on the Word doc and send back to me for review. Be assured, I have NOT made any revisions to your actual CR, the revision is only a copy with the draft revised language. As soon as we have agreement on the revised language, I will make the appropriate changes to the CR, if you are ok with that. If you feel more comfortable, you can submit the revised CR via the CMP CR Form to cmpcr@qwest.com Thanks, Peggy Esquibel-Reed Qwest CRPM -- Systems

-- March 20, 2003 Systems CMP Meeting Discussion: Donna Osborne-Miller/AT&T presented the CR. Phyllis Burt/AT&T stated that AT&T reviewed with Wendy Green (Qwest) for the first portion of the CR, regarding TN FIDs, that the documentation on the Website was incorrect. Wendy Green/Qwest stated that Qwest is updating the Feature’s documentation and suggested that it be a global action item for tracking in this forum. Phyllis Burt/AT&T said that she agreed. Liz Balvin/WorldCom asked what the documentation was called. Wendy Green/Qwest stated that it was part of the PCAT. Liz Balvin/WorldCom said thank you. Wendy Green/Qwest asked AT&T if they believed that the other two portions of the CR were covered in Mallory Paxton’s (Qwest) CR (SCR022103-01). Phyllis Burt/AT&T stated that the billing USOCs are taken care of with Mallory’s CR. Phyllis stated that she was not sure if the line level USOCs, TBE, are addressed in Mallory’s CR. Mallory Paxton/Qwest stated that her CR will generate USOCs and FIDs and that the TBE would be covered. Phyllis Burt/AT&T asked if she had to only provide the line level USOC. Mallory Paxton/Qwest stated if the block field indicates the you are requesting screening. Phyllis Burt/AT&T stated that she will revise the CR to be for the LTOS field only. Mallory Paxton/Qwest stated that she would need to look into that as Qwest does not support that field. John Gallegos/Qwest asked if this CR is now only for the LTOS field. Donna Osborne-Miller/AT&T stated yes, that Mallory’s CR will satisfy AT&T’s need, except for LTOS. John Gallegos/Qwest stated that the LOE will be revised for LTOS only. Connie Winston/Qwest stated that the LOE may not change as LTOS is a significant piece of work. Kit Thomte/Qwest asked if the revised LOE would be available prior to the ballot going out. John Gallegos/Qwest stated that the correct LOE would be on the ballot. Donna Osborne-Miller/AT&T recapped that the TN FID is documentation, Blocking will be Mallory’s CR, and LTOS will be what this CR is for. Kit Thomte/Qwest asked if there were any other questions. There were no further questions or comments.

-- March 12, 2003 Email from AT&T: Hi Wendy, As a follow-up to our QWEST CR clarification call today. Here are the QWEST links that provide the TN FID Order requirement for multiline orders.

"Feature Detail (FID and Data Requirements) Include the FID TN and the 10-digit telephone number in the Feature Detail when the account is multi-line; e.g., N NSD/TN NPA-nnn-nnnn. "

This is just a sample list. This requirement is mentioned on almost every QWEST feature:

http://www.qwest.com/wholesale/clecs/features/callerid.html http://www.qwest.com/wholesale/clecs/features/callwaiting.html http://www.qwest.com/wholesale/clecs/features/callwaitingid.html http://www.qwest.com/wholesale/clecs/features/callforwardvariable.html http://www.qwest.com/wholesale/clecs/features/customringing.html http://www.qwest.com/wholesale/clecs/features/lastcallreturn.html

Please confirm that the QWEST documentation is incorrect and that QWEST require this information for any feature. AT&T Consumer will keep this logic in place until we receive confirmation.

Thanks,

Phyllis

-- Clarification Meeting - March 12, 2003 Attendees: Donna Osborne-Miller/AT&T, Phyllis Burt/AT&T, Regina Mosley/AT&T, Carla Pardee/AT&T, Diane Burt/AT&T, John Blaszczyk/AT&T, Peggy Esquibel-Reed/Qwest, Monica Manning/Qwest, Terri Kilker/Qwest, John Gallegos/Qwest, Berkley Loggie/Qwest, Lynn Stecklein/Qwest, Wendy Green/Qwest, Jan Martin/Qwest, Denise Martinez/Qwest, Shelley Mason/Qwest, Rob Mitchell/Qwest, Laurel Nolan/Qwest, Shonna Pasionek/Qwest, Mallory Paxton/Qwest, Joan Pfeffer/Qwest, Deb Roth/Qwest, Carl Sear/Qwest, Kerri Waldner/Qwest, Scott Carne/Qwest

Reviewed CR Description: Current QWEST requires the following ILEC specific information on the order

- TN FIDs on Features for Multi-line Accounts. AT&T requests that QWEST system generate this ILEC specific requirement based on the LSOG TNS field provided on the order.

For example: We populate the TNS field on the RS form for each telephone on the RS form. QWEST has an ILEC specific requirement that we also specify the telephone on each feature on the RS form as well for a multi-line account. QWEST should system generate this ILEC specific data based on the LSOG fields instead of requiring CLECs to reported this information in two separate formats.

- BLOCK USOCs AT&T requests that QWEST system generate this ILEC specific requirement based on the LSOG BLOCK field provided on the order.

For example: We populate the BLOCK field on the RS form. QWEST has an ILEC specific requirement that we supply the BLOCK USOC that corresponds to each BLOCK value on the RS form. QWEST should system generate this ILEC specific data based on the LSOG fields instead of requiring CLECs to reported this information in two separate formats.

- LINE LEVEL USOC with TBE information AT&T requests that QWEST system generate this ILEC specific requirement based on the LSOG LTOS (LSOG field not currently supported by QWEST) and BLOCK field.

For example: QWEST should use the LTOS (Line Type of Service) field on the RS form. QWEST has an ILEC specific requirement that we supply the LINE LEVEL USOC and the Toll Billing Exception BLOCK option as a FEATURE on the RS form. QWEST should system generate this ILEC specific data based on the LSOG LTOS and BLOCK fields instead of requiring CLECs to reported this information in a different format.

Expected Deliverables: To be compatible with Release 14.0.

Confirmed Impacted Interface: IMA Common

Confirmed Products: UNE-P POTS

Discussion: Wendy Green/Qwest stated that when placing an order, you don’t have to input the TN, it is derived from the TNS field. Phyllis Burt/AT&T stated that is basing this per current documentation. Wendy Green/Qwest stated that in EDI, it is not a requirement. Wendy Green (Qwest) and Phyllis (AT&T) agreed to look into off-line. Phyllis Burt/AT&T stated that she will modify the CR, if needed. Carla Pardee/AT&T stated that she wants the documentation to be consistent. Wendy Green/Qwest agreed with Carla. Mallory Paxton/Qwest stated that she has originated a new CMP CR, SCR022103-01 IMA Revise BA & BLOCK Fields on RS & CRS Forms, which will do what is being asked for here. Phyllis Burt/AT&T asked if line level TBE is being addressed. Mallory Paxton/Qwest stated that she thought it was and if not, she would revise her CR to include it. Phyllis Burt/AT&T stated that if that is the case, this CR may be withdrawn.

Action Plan: This CR will be presented by AT&T at the March 20th CMP Meeting and Qwest will be providing the CR response.

CenturyLink Response

RE: SCR022703-10

Qwest has reviewed the information submitted as part of Change Request SCR022703-10 Based upon the scope of this CR as agreed to in the Clarification Meeting (held March 12, 2003) Qwest is able to provide an estimated Level of Effort (LOE) of 1650 to 2750 hours for this IMA Change Request with no SATE impacts.

At the March Systems CMP Meeting, CMP participants will be given the opportunity to comment on this Change Request and provide additional clarifications. Any clarifications and/or modifications identified at that time will be incorporated into Qwest’s further evaluation of this Change Request.

This Change Request is eligible for the IMA 14.0 Prioritization.

Sincerely, Qwest