Wholesale: Products & Services

Archived System CR SCR011303-02EX Detail

WCom requests an ad-hoc meeting be scheduled as soon as possible to vote on the following:

"Yes" would allow WCom’s intended prioritized results be included in results for IMA 13.0.

"No" would cause initial prioritized results to stand.

Status History

Project Meetings

January 23, 2003 Conference Call Meeting Start Time: 1 p.m. NOTE: The meeting began at 1:00 p.m. MT. The meeting took place as an Ad-Hoc Meeting.

Purpose The purpose of the Exception Meeting was to vote on whether to grant SCR011303-02EX. A vote was planned and noted during the Pre-Meeting held during the January Systems CMP Meeting on January 16, 2003.

Attachments a) Attendees (see below)

Meeting Minutes Nolan-Qwest started the meeting with roll call. She then stated that quorum was calculated in accordance with section 17.4.1 of the Qwest Wholesale Change Management Process document. She stated that the quorum was set at five and that seven companies had submitted votes or were on the call. She stated that a vote would be taken during this call. Nolan-Qwest then reviewed the purpose of the call. She stated that it was to vote on the exception of SCR011303-02EX submitted by WorldCom. She reviewed the exception vote notification stating that “This Exception CR seeks an exception from the timeline delineated in Section 10.3.2 of the Qwest Wholesale Change Management Process Document. This exception requests permission for WorldCom to resubmit their prioritization for IMA 13.0, because their initial list reflected the reverse of WorldCom’s intent. If this exception is granted it would cause the IMA 13.0 prioritized results to be recalculated.” She then stated that the pre-meeting was held during the January CMP Systems Meeting. Nolan-Qwest then asked if there were any questions. No questions were asked.

Nolan-Qwest then reviewed the “yes” and “no” vote definition. She stated that a vote of ‘Yes’ will indicate a preference to allow WorldCom to resubmit prioritization for IMA 13.0. A vote of ‘No’ will indicate a preference that Qwest NOT implement a change to the timeline. She also noted that if this exception is granted it would cause the IMA 13.0 prioritized results to be recalculated. She asked if there were any questions or concerns. No questions were asked.

Nolan-Qwest stated that Qwest had received votes from WorldCom, Eschelon, and Allegiance. Van Meter-AT&T asked if she had received AT&T’s vote. Nolan-Qwest stated that she had and apologized for not calling it out in the list. She asked for the other companies who were participating on the call to please email in their votes to cmpcr@qwest.com. She then stated that email votes were received by McLeod and Qwest. Barard-Covad stated that he had also sent his in. Nolan-Qwest then stated that she was waiting for the Covad vote. She then stated that the vote was received and that the Exception was granted with 7 “yes” votes, 0 “no” votes, and 0 “abstains”. She stated that an email would be distributed with the vote disposition and that the Initial Prioritization Form would be distributed. She stated that it would be the same as the example that was sent out with the Exception Vote Notification. She asked if there were any questions. No questions were asked.

Nolan-Qwest then thanked everyone for participating and reminded the companies that the SATE prioritization was due by 5:00pm that day.

Meeting adjourned.

Attachment 1

Attendance Sheet:

Qwest: Laurel Nolan Judy Schultz Kit Thomte Connie Winston

McLeod: Stephanie Prull

AT&T: Sharron Van Meter

Covad: John Barard

WorldCom: Liz Balvin

Allegiance: Ian Coleman Excerpt from January Systems CMP Meeting on January 16, 2003

Laurel Nolan/Qwest stated that two notifications went out on January 14th, one was an exception for the sunset of IMA 11.0 (SCR010803-01EX) and the other is the exception for WorldCom’s prioritization for IMA 13.0 (SCR011303-02EX). Laurel Nolan/Qwest stated that the vote for SCR010803-01EX would be in the February Systems CMP Meeting. Laurel stated that an ad-hoc meeting would not be needed due to the timelines. Laurel reviewed McLeod’s exception request. Stephanie Prull/McLeod stated that the goal is the first or second week of Septemberr, with the earliest being around August 12. Laurel Nolan/Qwest reviewed that the “yes” vote would mean that we would move forward with changing the date, a “no” vote would mean that we would stay with the timeline as stated. She then stated that the vote would take place during the next Monthly Meeting in February. Laurel Nolan/Qwest- stated that the second exception request was submitted by WorldCom, SCR011303-02EX. Laurel stated that WorldCom is requesting to re-submit their prioritization and the exception is requesting that the prioritization results get re-calculated. A “yes” vote would mean to allow the new prioritization list as well as the recalculation. A “no” vote would mean to stay with the current calculation. We have the vote meeting scheduled for Thursday, January 23, 2003. Ian Coleman/Allegiance stated that his concern is that he would rather see Qwest recalculate the vote, he does not want WorldCom to submit a different prioritization now that they have seen the results of the vote. Judy Schultz/Qwest clarified that WorldCom is not resubmitting their vote, they are just flip-flopping the assignment. Connie Winston/Qwest asked if it was acceptable to ask how the CLECs felt about this. Bonnie Johnson/Eschelon stated that she we would support the request. Laurel Nolan/Qwest stated that she would include the attachment with the meeting notice. Liz Balvin/WorldCom stated that she has already calculated and has sent it to the CLECs. Lynn Notarianni/Qwest stated that based on the feedback from the CLECs, Qwest is to move forward with the flip-flopped list. Sue Stott/Qwest stated that time has been lost.

CenturyLink Response