Wholesale: Products & Services

Open Product/Process CR PC112403-1 Detail

Description Of Change

Project Meetings

Mark Coyne-Qwest stated that Qwest contacted AT&T and they agreed to withdraw this CR. Bonnie Johnson-Eschelon asked for the description and status of this CR. Lynn Stecklein-Qwest stated that this CR is in a deferred status and is a request for a blocking feature for 411 and 555-1212. She said that AT&T completed testing and no longer needed this request. Bonnie Johnson-Eschelon stated that they would like to take a look to see if there is any interest in sponsoring this CR. She said that she may be thinking of another CR that was denied. Laurie Fredricksen-Integra stated that she could not find the CR on the agenda. Lynn Stecklein-Qwest stated that we just found out yesterday that AT&T wanted to withdraw so it is not in the package. She said that this discussion will be in the meeting minutes for their review

E-mail From AT&T

Hi Lynn, Sorry for the delay in responding to you.... it's taken awhile to find someone to provide input to this issue. Since it seems there is no longer support for this change and there is an existing solution, I would support withdrawing this CR. Thanks for your patience. Kathy

- From: Stecklein, Lynn [mailto:Lynn.Stecklein@qwest.com] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 11:49 AM To: LEE, KATHY T, ATTCORP Cc: Esquibel-Reed, Peggy Subject: FW: PC112403-1 Request for blocking feature for 411 and 555-1212

Hi Kathy, The attached CR is currently in a deferred status. In January of 2006, AT&T stated that they were checking internally to determine if the testing with CustomNet Option 1 would satisfy the needs of this CR. (see below) Can you let me know if that testing is complete and if you want this CR to remain in a deferred status or if the testing met the needs of the request? If it has, we can place the CR in a Pending Withdrawal status for the October CMP Meeting. Thanks for your help in advance. Lynn Stecklein Qwest Wholesale CRPM

Lynn, I've finally found a person who is interested in this. We need to keep this open for now. We are checking on the testing. I'll try to get more status in a few days - after this specific person checks on the testing. Thanks. Sharon

- From: Stecklein, Lynn [mailto:Lynn.Stecklein@qwest.com] Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 10:09 AM To: Van Meter, Sharon K, NEO Subject: RE: PC112403-1 Request for blocking feature for 411 and 555-1212

Hi Sharon,

Have you heard anything on whether AT&T has completed their testing?

Thanks,

Lynn Stecklein

Qwest Wholesale CRPM

303 382-5770

--Original Message-- From: Van Meter, Sharon K, NEO [mailto:svanmeter@att.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 11:26 AM To: Stecklein, Lynn Cc: Esquibel-Reed, Peggy Subject: RE: PC112403-1 Request for blocking feature for 411 and 555-1212

Lynn,

I'm checking internally - I'll let you know as soon as I hear something.

Sharon

E-mail send to AT&T 11/2/05

Hi Sharon,

We have been researching change requests that are currently in deferred status. The attached CR PC112403-1 (Request for blocking feature for 411 and 555-1212) is currently in deferred status. The project meeting minutes dated 2/18/04 states the following:

‘Carla Pardee, Qwest said that she is waiting for AT&T to conclude their testing with CustomNet Option 1 to see if this will satisfy the needs of this CR. She would like to move the Status to Deferred until AT&T completes testing.’

Can you let me know if AT&T has concluded the testing of the Customer Net Option 1? And, is so, does it meet your needs?

Thanks,

Lynn Stecklein

Qwest Wholesale CRPM

303 382-5770

2/18/04 CMP Meeting Carla Pardee, Qwest said that she is waiting for AT&T to conclude their testing with CustomNet Option 1 to see if this will satisfy the needs of this CR. She would like to move the Status to Deferred until AT&T completes testing.

-- 1/21/04 January CMP Meeting Aaron Smith, Qwest stated a Clarification Call was held on January 8 and that Operator blocking had just been added to the CR at that time. On the call it was felt CustomNet option 1 might meet the requirements of the CR. Carla Pardee, AT&T said that AT&T had evaluated CustomNet before but wanted something simpler. AT&T is now re-evaluating. Bonnie Johnson, Eschelon stated Eschelon would submit a separate CR for a 411 block only. The CR will stay in Evaluation.

- Clarification Meeting 2:00 p.m. (MDT) / Thursday January 8, 2004 1-877-521-8688 1456160 PC 112403-1Request Blocking Feature for 411 and 5551212.

Attendees Carla Pardee, AT&T Dave Fane, AT&T Liz Balvin, MCI Kim Isaacs, Eschelon Patti Leo, Qwest Doug Andreen, Qwest Aaron Smith, Qwest Marty Cruze, Qwest Jo Wees, Qwest Carolyn Vance, Qwest Rose Bochnicek, Qwest John Gallegos, Qwest

Meeting Agenda: 1.0Introduction of Attendees

Introduction of participants on the conference call was made and the purpose of the call discussed.

2.0Review Requested (Description of) Change

Doug Andreen, Qwest read the CR description: AT&T is requesting a single USOC, territory wide, that will block 411 and 555-1212. And added that recently AT&T had requested to add blocking operator (O) calls which is why we wanted to have a second clarification call with a wider audience than the first.

Carla Pardee, AT&T added that the intent is to block long distance call completion on customers that have delinquent bills.

Dave Fane added that this is a customer by customer block for customers not paying their bills.

Carolyn Vance, Qwest asked if the object was not to complete the call.

Dave answered yes with the same messages that are normally used.

There was much discussion around appropriate blocks to 411, 555-1212, O+ and 0- calls with the following outcome. CustomNet option 1 will block will block 411and 555-1212. 0+ calls are routed to an operator for alternate billing but cannot be billed to the owner TN. This was acceptable to AT&T. O- calls are completed to an operator but the operator’s screen indicates that calls cannot be charged to the owner TN and that the call may not be transferred to DA. However, calling card calls will not be blocked. This would have to be blocked separately in LIDB as done today.

AT&T agreed to test option 1 CustomNet to see if it would fully meet their needs and to let Doug know.

Kim Isaacs, Eschelon expressed a desire to have this CR appended to for a 411 block only.

Doug advised in order to not confuse the testing of CustomNet option 1 by AT&T and a block for 411 only that a new CR should be submitted.

Kim will submit the new CR.

3.0Confirm Areas & Products Impacted UNE-P

4.0Confirm Right Personnel Involved Correct personnel were involved in the meeting.

5.0Identify/Confirm CLEC’s Expectation AT&T will test CustomNet option 1 to see if it meets their requirements for this CR.

6.0Identify any Dependent Systems Change Requests None

7.0Establish Action Plan (Resolution Time Frame) An update on testing will be made to Doug and also at the January CMP meeting.

- 12/17/03 December CMP Meeting Carla Pardee, AT&T presented this CR asking for a territory wide USOC that gives the ability to block a customers ability to reach a 411 or 5551212 DA operator. Carla realizes that Custom Net and Toll Block Restriction provides several features but not a single USOC as described above. Bonnie Johnson, Eschelon supports the CR saying Eschelon has customers who need to block the ability to reach DA operators without interfering with long distance capabilities. The CR was moved to Presented status.

- CLEC Change Request Clarification Meeting 12:30 p.m. (MDT) / Thursday December 11, 2003 1-877-521-8688 1456160# PC 112403-1Request Blocking Feature for 411 and 5551212. Attendees: Name/Company: Carla Pardee, AT&T Yolanda Bennett, AT&T Doug Andreen, Qwest Mallory Paxton, Qwest

Introduction of Attendees Introduction of participants on the conference call was made and the purpose of the call discussed.

Review Requested (Description of) Change Doug read the CR description: AT&T is requesting a single USOC, territory wide, that will block 411 and 555-1212.

Carla Pardee, AT&T added that she realizes that Custom Net and Toll Blocking offers a variety of features but AT&T desires a single USOC that blocks 411 and 555-1212.

Mallory Paxton, Qwest asked Carla if they want this only to block these two features.

Carla said yes.

Mallory asked if this was an option in other RBOCS?

Yolanda answered that it was available but she was unsure if it was a single feature.

Doug asked if the purpose was to block customers who owed bills from making long distance calls?

Carla answered yes.

Confirm Areas & Products Impacted UNE-P

Confirm Right Personnel Involved Correct personnel were involved in the meeting.

Identify/Confirm CLEC’s Expectation By February 2004, AT&T requests that Qwest implement a single USOC, Qwest territory wide, that will block 411 and 555-1212.

Identify any Dependent Systems Change Requests None

Establish Action Plan (Resolution Time Frame) Carla will present for AT&T at the December CMP meeting.

CenturyLink Response

DRAFT RESPONSE For Review by CLEC Community and Discussion at the January 2004 CMP Meeting

Carla Pardee LSAM Manager AT&T

SUBJECT: Qwest’s Change Request Response PC112403-1 Request for blocking feature for 411 and 555-1212

This letter is in response to AT&T’s Change Request (CR) PC112403-1. This CR requests that Qwest provide a single USOC territory wide to block access to DA operators using 411 and 555-1212. Recently, AT&T added to the original CR a request to also block access to Operator (O) calls using the same USOC.

Qwest is currently evaluating this request and proposes moving this Change Request into Evaluation Status while we continue to investigate. Qwest will provide an updated response at the February 2004 CMP meeting.

Sincerely,

Aaron Smith Manager Product Management