Open Product/Process CR PC101606-1 Detail |
Title: Grandparent WATS USOCs | ||||||
CR Number |
Current Status Date |
Area Impacted | Products Impacted | |||
|
||||||
PC101606-1 |
Completed 12/14/2006 |
Resale, UNE-P |
Originator: Van Dusen, Janean |
Originator Company Name: Qwest Corporation |
Owner: Van Dusen, Janean |
Director: |
CR PM: Stecklein, Lynn |
Description Of Change |
USOC USOC USOC USOC Arizona
OutWard WATS WAX++ WOB++ WO2 WOA++ 800 Service 8L9++ 8Q9++ 8J9++ 800 ServiceLine WFA++ WFS1X Ancillary WATS Service NX3 EWW
Colorado OutWard WATS WAX++ WOB++ WO2 WOA++ 800 Service 8L9++ 8Q9++ 8J9++ 800 ServiceLine WFA++ Ancillary WATS Service NX3 EWW
Iowa OutWard WATS WAX++ WOB++ WO2 WOA++ 800 Service 8L9++ 8Q9++ 8J9++ Two-Way WATS TWAS+ TWX++ TW4++ 800 ServiceLine WFA++ Four Wire Term Arrangement 4WA
South Idaho 800 Service 8L9++ 8Q9++ 8J9++ 800 ServiceLine WFA++ Ancillary WATS NX3 EWW
North Idaho 800 Service 8L9++ 8Q9++ 8J9++ 800 ServiceLine WFA++ WFS1X Ancillary WATS NX3 EWW
Minnesota Full Time
Outward WATS (full time) WF7 800 Service (full time) WAT 8T2 8CZ Outward WATS (measured time) WAXS++ WOB++WO2++ WOA++ 800 Service 8L9S+ 8Q9+ 8J9++ Two-Way WATS TWAS+TWX++TW4++ 800 ServiceLine WFA++WFS1X Four Wire Term Arrangement 4WA Access Line Extension WKK EWW EWU WDT
Montana 800 Service 8L9++ 8Q9++ 8J9++ 800 ServiceLine WFA++ Ancillary WATS NX3 EWW
North Dakota 800 Service 8L9S+ 8Q9++ 8J9++ Two-Way WATS TWAS+ TWX++ TW4++ 800 ServiceLine WFA++ Four Wire Term Arrangement 4WA
Nebraska 800 Service 8L9S+ 8Q9++ 8J9++ 800 ServiceLine WFA++ Two-Way WATS TWAS+ WX++ TW4++ Four Wire Term Arrangement 4WA
New Mexico OutWard WATS WAX++ WOB++ WO2 WOA++ 800 Service 8L9++ 8Q9++ 8J9++ 800 ServiceLine WFA Ancillary WATS NX3 EWW
Oregon OutWard WATS (already grandfathered) 800 Service (already grandfathered) 800 ServiceLine WFA++
South Dakota 800 Service 8L9S+ 8Q9++ 8J9++ 800 ServiceLine WFA++ Two-Way WATS TWAS+TWX++TW4++ Four Wire Term Arrangement 4WA
Utah 800 Service 8L9++ 8Q9++ 8J9++ 800 ServiceLine WFA++ Ancillary WATS NX3 EWW
Washington OutWard WATS WAX WOB WO2 WOA 800 Service 8L9 8Q9++ 8J9++ 800 ServiceLine WFA++ Ancillary WATS WSP
Wyoming OutWard WATS WAX++ WOB++WO2 WOA++ 800 Service 8L9++ 8Q9++ 8J9++ 800 ServiceLine WFA++ Ancillary WATS NX3 EWW
|
Date | Action | Description |
10/16/2006 | CR Submitted | |
10/16/2006 | CR Acknowledged | |
10/20/2006 | Discussed in the October Product/Process CMP Meeting - See Attachment D in the Distribution Package | |
10/18/2006 | Status changed to Presented | |
11/15/2006 | Discussed in the November Product/Process CMP Meeting - See Attachment D in the Distribution Package | |
11/17/2006 | Status changed to Development | |
11/18/2006 | Communicator Issued - PROD.11.18.06.F.04336.Grandparent_WATS_USOCs | |
12/9/2006 | Status changed to CLEC Test | |
12/14/2006 | Discussed in the December Product/Process CMP Meeting - See Attachment D in the Distribution Package | |
12/14/2006 | Status changed to Completed |
Project Meetings |
12/14/06 Product/Process CMP Meeting Mark Coyne-Qwest stated that this CR became effective last month and that we would like to close it. There was no objection in closing this CR. 11/15/06 Product/Process CMP Meeting Mark Coyne-Qwest stated that a Level 2 notice will be sent on November 17th and that this CR will move to Development. (Comments to minutes received from Eschelon - Mark Coyne-Qwest stated that Qwest lowered this to a Level 2 notice and it will be sent on November 17th and that this CR will move to Development.) 10/19/06 Product/Process CMP Meeting Janean Van Dusen-Qwest stated that this CR was a simple CR to Grandparent WATS USOCs in several states. She said that only 2 USOCs – WFA and 8L9++ have resellers and that all of the other USOCs listed in the CR have no end users. She said that she would like to implement with a level 2 instead of a level 4 notice with a December 9th effective date. Kim Isaacs-Eschelon asked if any of these WATS USOCs were available on QPP. Janean Van Dusen-Qwest said no. Kim Isaacs-Eschelon asked if the grandparented USOCs stay on the account with no new activity. Janean Van Dusen-Qwest said yes. Kim Isaacs-Eschelon asked what the benefit of a level 2 vs. level 4 was. Janean Van Dusen-Qwest stated that there are less notices involved with a level 2. Susan Lorence-Qwest stated that with a level 2 notice that there is a 7 day comment cycle, 7 day Qwest response to CLEC comments if applicable and a final notice if there are CLEC comments. Susan asked if there was any objection to the level 2 notice and there was no dissent.
|
Information Current as of 1/11/2021