Archived System CR 4869914 Detail |
| Title: Allow IMA GUI users to use telephone number spans (ranges) and single telephone numbers on the same LSR. | |||||
| CR Number |
Current Status Date |
Level of Effort |
Interface/ Release No. |
Area Impacted |
Products Impacted |
|
|
|||||
| 4869914 |
Completed 3/21/2002 |
- | 3/9 | All products that use TN | |
| Originator: Dowding, Byron |
| Originator Company Name: Alltel |
| Owner: Winston, Connie |
| Director: |
| CR PM: Routh, Mark |
| Description Of Change |
|
ALLTEL would like the ability to use a span (range) of telephone numbers and single telephone numbers together on the same LSR for the same customer. Currently, users can enter 5001, 5002, 5003, and 5009 but cannot enter 5001-5003 and 5009 on same LSR.
|
Status History |
| Date | Action | Description |
| Release Information | IMA Release 9.00 | |
| 6/21/2000 | CR Submitted | Submitted |
| 6/29/2000 | Status Changed | New -- To be clarified. |
| 6/29/2000 | Status Changed | New -- To be industry evaluated. Sent email to Byron Dowding with CR # and status. |
| 6/29/2000 | Record Update | Discussed CR clarification with Byron Dowding in phone call. |
| 7/19/2000 | Status Changed | Status changed to Evaluated – To be reviewed. |
| 7/28/2000 | Info Sent to CLEC | Sent email to Byron Dowding about status change and form change to version 05. |
| 8/2/2000 | Status Changed | Reviewed -- Under consideration |
| 8/15/2000 | Info Sent to CLEC | Sent email to Byron Dowding with updated Interfaces Impacted section per phone call. |
| 8/16/2000 | Discussed at Monthly CMP Meeting | Received T-shirt size and option during industry team meeting. |
| 8/29/2000 | Info Sent to CLEC | Sent email to Byron Dowding with updated CR. |
| 10/18/2000 | Status Changed | Status changed to Reviewed – Release Baseline Candidate. Selected as Co-Provider CR for target IMA Release 8.0. T-shirt size Small. |
| 11/8/2000 | Info Sent to CLEC | Sent email to Byron Dowding with updated CR. |
| 3/13/2001 | Status Changed | Status Changed to Reviewed – Under Consideration This work has been de-scoped for IMA 8.0. |
| 3/15/2001 | Info Sent to CLEC | Sent email to Byron Dowding and Dave Hahn with updated CR. |
| 10/24/2001 | Discussed at Monthly CMP Meeting | CLECs notified this CR was a selected CR Baseline Candidate. |
| 11/28/2001 | Info Sent to CLEC | Info sent to Alltel; see project meeting notes |
| 12/6/2001 | CLEC Provided Information | Byron Dowding confirmed that UR1412 (9.0 release) will accomplish what this CR is requesting. They are looking for portability |
| 2/25/2002 | Status Changed | 4869914 status updated to 'CLEC Test' based upon 2/25/02 implementation of IMA 9.0 |
| 3/21/2002 | Status Changed | Reviewed in the 3/21/02 CMP meeting and Closed. |
| 3/21/2002 | Discussed at Monthly CMP Meeting | 4869914 discussed March Systems CMP Monthly meeting; please see Systems CMP Distribution Package March CMP - Attachment E |
Project Meetings |
| 11/28/01 E-Mail sent to Alltel for clarification: Byron, We need to clarify a question that has come to our attention on the above CR. The description of change says, "ALLTELL would like the ability to use a span (range) of telephone numbers and single telephone numbers together on the same LSR for the same customer. Currently, users can 5001, 5002, 5003, and 5009 but cannot enter 5001-5003 and 5009 on the same LSR. There is not mention of a specific product or LSR form to be impacted by the change. The UR issued for the CR has the following listed in the assumptions and dependencies: Products associated with this candidate are UBL w/NP and UDL w/NP. This request is for ported TNs only. Loop products with number portability are the only products impacted with this request. The IMA CR is scheduled for the 9.0 Release and will "allow the entry of a range or ranges with individual numbers in any combination on a single request for LNP". Your Change Request didn't specify a product or LSR form. The UR specified Loop Service with Number Portability. The IMA CR only addresses Number Portability. Different LSR forms are required for Number Portability (NP) vs Loop Service with Number Portability (LSNP). In the 9.0 Release you will see the change for NP but not LSNP. Is this what you were expecting to see (product/form change) with the 9.0 Release. Thanks for your help in advance!
|
CenturyLink Response |
| RE: CR4869914 - Allow IMA GUI Users to use TN spans (ranges) and Number Portability is what we would like. So if I read this correctly Release 9.0 would take care of this. thanks Byron Dowding OSS Coordinator CLEC Nebraska Market ALLTEL Phone: 402.436.4336 Pager: 402.790.6069 Fax: 402.436.5160 Email: Byron.Dowding@alltel.com
> --Original Message-- > From: "Lynn Stecklein" [SMTP:lsteckl@qwest.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:24 PM > To: Dowding, Byron > Cc: "Peggy Esquibel-Reed" > Subject: CR4869914 - Allow IMA GUI Users to use TN spans (ranges) and > > Byron, We need to clarify a question that has come to our attention on the > above CR. The description of change says, "ALLTELL would like the ability > to use a span (range) of telephone numbers and single telephone numbers > together on the same LSR for the same customer. Currently, users can 5001, > 5002, 5003, and 5009 but cannot enter 5001-5003 and 5009 on the same LSR. > There is not mention of a specific product or LSR form to be impacted by > the change. > > The UR issued for the CR has the following listed in the assumptions and > dependencies: Products associated with this candidate are UBL w/NP and UDL > w/NP. This request is for ported TNs only. Loop products with number > portability are the only products impacted with this request. > > The IMA CR is scheduled for the 9.0 Release and will "allow the entry of a > range or ranges with individual numbers in any combination on a single > request for LNP". > > Your Change Request didn't specify a product or LSR form. The UR specified > Loop Service with Number Portability. The IMA CR only addresses Number > Portability. Different LSR forms are required for Number Portability (NP) > vs Loop Service with Number Portability (LSNP). In the 9.0 Release you > will > see the change for NP but not LSNP. > > Is this what you were expecting to see (product/form change) with the 9.0 > Release. > > Thanks for your help in advance!
|
Information Current as of 1/11/2021